Showing posts with label GM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GM. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

If Genetically Modified Apples Don't Brown, Can You Tell If They're Rotten?

Soon after slicing a conventional Granny Smith apple (left) starts to brown, while a newly-developed GM Granny Smith stays fresher looking.

Soon after slicing a conventional Granny Smith apple (left) starts to brown, while a newly-developed GM Granny Smith stays fresher looking.

Soon after slicing a conventional Granny Smith apple (left) starts to brown, while a newly-developed GM Granny Smith stays fresher looking.

In the fairytale world, a shiny red apple can lead to a poisonous end. But some see two genetically engineered green apple varieties, poised to become the first to gain U.S. Department of Agriculture approval, as similar harbingers of doom.

Okaganan Specialty Fruits, Inc., the company that has developed Granny Smith and Golden Delicious varieties that don't go brown when you slice them, says the fears are overblown and the apples are safe to eat.

Now, we've reported extensively on the heated debate over labeling genetically engineered food, and there's no denying that genetically-modified (GM) foods are a polarizing issue. But, would an apple that doesn't turn brown prevent us from telling whether it's rotten? The short answer is no. For the long answer, read on.

The non-browning trait aims to please consumers who don't like brown apples or the off taste from the preservatives frequently used to maintain color and fresh appearance in packages of pre-sliced apples, says Neal Carter, Okanagan's president. "Ultimately, we just want people to eat more apples," he says. Carter also argues the innovation would help apple slice producers, who can lose up to half of their product due to browning during production.

Nevertheless, as the public comment period on a petition to approve these apples closed last month, many consumers worry are they safe to eat?

First let's look at the physical properties of apples. No matter how you slice it, every apple turns brown eventually. "When their flesh is cut, the oxygen in the air interacts with chemicals in the flesh of the apple," says Susan Brown, a plant scientist at Cornell University in Geneva, N.Y. An enzyme called polyphenol oxidase (PPO) makes melanin, an iron-containing compound that gives apple cells a brown tinge. The same type of "oxidative" browning happens in the browning of tea, coffee, or mushrooms, explains Brown.

Within five minutes of slicing, browning can alter the taste and might not be as aesthetically pleasing, but it doesn't mean the apple is old or rotten.

To prevent oxidative browning, the GM apples developed by Okanagan stop PPO production with a man-made gene containing pieces of four natural PPO genes. An insertion with gene fragments is an automatic red flag for the apple cell usually the first step of viral attack so it chops up every sequence of DNA that looks like the suspicious fragment, and the apple flesh stays light.

"The beauty of this [process] is it's a natural plant defense mechanism," says Carter. Even when sliced, these apples stay clear of browning for about two weeks that's roughly the same extended lifespan as apple slices from McDonald's and Burger King, which use lemon juice and calcium ascorbate to prevent browning.

But if the apple doesn't go brown, then how do you tell if it's rotten? An apple with just oxidative browning isn't automatically rotten. Rotting comes from a fungal or bacterial infection - which causes the apple to go either mushy or dry. Infecting spores, not melanin, also give the flesh a dark brown hue. So, taking PPO out of the equation won't make a rotten apple appear pristine. "'Bad' apples will still be evident," says Brown. Rotting GM apples look rotten and turn brown from a bacterial or fungal infection the same as a conventional apple.

But, Bill Freese, a science policy analyst at the Center for Food Safety, notes that some studies in tomatoes have shown that silencing PPO impacts a plant's susceptibility to diseases and invasive insects because the enzyme may play a role in plant defense reactions.

Since we already have hybrid "low-browning" varieties and successful preservative treatments, some people wonder if we really need an apple that doesn't go brown. "We fully support genetic and genomics research," says Mark Gedris, the US Apple Association's director of communications. "But we haven't heard customers calling for a non-browning GE apple."

From nutrient value to taste, these apples are indistinguishable from a normal one, say Carter and Brown. If they do gain USDA approval, whether people will buy them is another story. "It's up to the consumer to decide," Brown says.

As we've reported before, much of our processed foods that contain soy or corn are genetically-modified, but fresh produce has been a tougher sell - anybody remember the Flavr Savr tomato?


All About Veganism << ADAPTT :: Animals Deserve Absolute ... A collection of essays by Gary Yourofsky and others that addresses nearly every question about veganism, from evolution and creation to the economy and vitamin B12. Ye Olde Journalist The pen is my sword in which to fight yellow Journalism. The truth is out there, and I am determined to report on it and tell it like it is, even if those claiming to ... Case Study Collection - National Center for Case Study Teaching in ... The case study method of teaching applied to college science teaching, from The National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science Welcome to the Future, Where Our Apples Never Brown Okanagan Specialty Fruits, a Canadian biotech company, has brought us the future... and it tastes like very fresh apples. Neal Carter, Okanagan's founder and grower ... Topic Galleries -- chicagotribune.com - Chicago Tribune: Chicago ... Topic galleries provide easy access to stories and photos about people, places, organizations, events and subjects of interest to you. They bring together rich ... Food & Drink - How To Information eHow.com Food & Drink: Don't let that next party be a flop. Be the envy of your friends thanks to eHow's entertaining secrets sure to make that next affair a success. Food is ... Technology and Science News - ABC News - ABCNews.com - Breaking ... Get the latest science news and technology news, read tech reviews and more at ABC News. Questions On Apples Q: I have an apple tree that I planted three or four years ago. Last year it was full of apples containing one or two small, white dots and a brown point in the ... Video - Breaking News Videos from CNN.com 'If you don't take your top off ... there are no photos't take your top off... Green Women's Lifestyle - Yahoo! Shine By s.e. smith, NetworxSometimes it seems like greening your home requires a master's degree, More Simple steps to greening your home

If GM Apples Don't Brown, How Can You Tell If They're Rotten?

Soon after slicing a conventional Granny Smith apple (left) starts to brown, while a newly-developed GM Granny Smith stays fresher looking.

Soon after slicing a conventional Granny Smith apple (left) starts to brown, while a newly-developed GM Granny Smith stays fresher looking.

Soon after slicing a conventional Granny Smith apple (left) starts to brown, while a newly-developed GM Granny Smith stays fresher looking.

In the fairytale world, a shiny red apple can lead to a poisonous end. But some see two genetically engineered green apple varieties, poised to become the first to gain U.S. Department of Agriculture approval, as similar harbingers of doom.

Okaganan Specialty Fruits, Inc., the company that has developed Granny Smith and Golden Delicious varieties that don't go brown when you slice them, says the fears are overblown and the apples are safe to eat.

Now, we've reported extensively on the heated debate over labeling genetically engineered food, and there's no denying that genetically-modified (GM) foods are a polarizing issue. But, would an apple that doesn't turn brown prevent us from telling whether it's rotten? The short answer is no. For the long answer, read on.

The non-browning trait aims to please consumers who don't like brown apples or the off taste from the preservatives frequently used to maintain color and fresh appearance in packages of pre-sliced apples, says Neal Carter, Okanagan's president. "Ultimately, we just want people to eat more apples," he says. Carter also argues the innovation would help apple slice producers, who can lose up to half of their product due to browning during production.

Nevertheless, as the public comment period on a petition to approve these apples closed last month, many consumers worry are they safe to eat?

First let's look at the physical properties of apples. No matter how you slice it, every apple turns brown eventually. "When their flesh is cut, the oxygen in the air interacts with chemicals in the flesh of the apple," says Susan Brown, a plant scientist at Cornell University in Geneva, N.Y. An enzyme called polyphenol oxidase (PPO) makes melanin, an iron-containing compound that gives apple cells a brown tinge. The same type of "oxidative" browning happens in the browning of tea, coffee, or mushrooms, explains Brown.

Within five minutes of slicing, browning can alter the taste and might not be as aesthetically pleasing, but it doesn't mean the apple is old or rotten.

To prevent oxidative browning, the GM apples developed by Okanagan stop PPO production with a man-made gene containing pieces of four natural PPO genes. An insertion with gene fragments is an automatic red flag for the apple cell usually the first step of viral attack so it chops up every sequence of DNA that looks like the suspicious fragment, and the apple flesh stays light.

"The beauty of this [process] is it's a natural plant defense mechanism," says Carter. Even when sliced, these apples stay clear of browning for about two weeks that's roughly the same extended lifespan as apple slices from McDonald's and Burger King, which use lemon juice and calcium ascorbate to prevent browning.

But if the apple doesn't go brown, then how do you tell if it's rotten? An apple with just oxidative browning isn't automatically rotten. Rotting comes from a fungal or bacterial infection - which causes the apple to go either mushy or dry. Infecting spores, not melanin, also give the flesh a dark brown hue. So, taking PPO out of the equation won't make a rotten apple appear pristine. "'Bad' apples will still be evident," says Brown. Rotting GM apples look rotten and turn brown from a bacterial or fungal infection the same as a conventional apple.

But, Bill Freese, a science policy analyst at the Center for Food Safety, notes that some studies in tomatoes have shown that silencing PPO impacts a plant's susceptibility to diseases and invasive insects because the enzyme may play a role in plant defense reactions.

Since we already have hybrid "low-browning" varieties and successful preservative treatments, some people wonder if we really need an apple that doesn't go brown. "We fully support genetic and genomics research," says Mark Gedris, the US Apple Association's director of communications. "But we haven't heard customers calling for a non-browning GE apple."

From nutrient value to taste, these apples are indistinguishable from a normal one, say Carter and Brown. If they do gain USDA approval, whether people will buy them is another story. "It's up to the consumer to decide," Brown says.

As we've reported before, much of our processed foods that contain soy or corn are genetically-modified, but fresh produce has been a tougher sell - anybody remember the Flavr Savr tomato?


Slate Magazine - Politics, Business, Technology, and the Arts ... Does Mitt Romney Want Your Vote? A Flowchart. How Many Americans Rely on Government Assistance, Exactly? Im Dreaming of a White President: Randy Newman Talks ... Business - Slate Magazine The Great Divergence. Inside the widening gap of America's income inequality. By Timothy Noah. Top Right Slate's list of the 25 Americans who combine ... Business News, Personal Finance and Money News - ABC News Find the latest business news on Wall Street, jobs and the economy, the housing market, personal finance and money investments and much more on ABC News Comment: editorials, opinion and columns - Telegraph Find the latest editorial comment, opinion and columns from the Telegraph Ye Olde Journalist The pen is my sword in which to fight yellow Journalism. The truth is out there, and I am determined to report on it and tell it like it is, even if those claiming to ... Video - Breaking News Videos from CNN.com 'If you don't take your top off ... there are no photos't take your top off... Technology and Science News - ABC News - ABCNews.com - Breaking ... Get the latest science news and technology news, read tech reviews and more at ABC News. Topic Galleries -- OrlandoSentinel.com - Orlando news, information ... Topic galleries provide easy access to stories and photos about people, places, organizations, events and subjects of interest to you. They bring together rich ... Green Women's Lifestyle - Yahoo! Shine By s.e. smith, NetworxSometimes it seems like greening your home requires a master's degree, More Simple steps to greening your home Welcome to the Future, Where Our Apples Never Brown Okanagan Specialty Fruits, a Canadian biotech company, has brought us the future... and it tastes like very fresh apples. Neal Carter, Okanagan's founder and grower ...

Thursday, September 20, 2012

As Scientists Question New Rat Study, GMO Debate Rages On

Italian farmer Giorgio Fidenato picks up what's left of his genetically altered corn after anti-GMO activists trampled it, back in 2010.

Italian farmer Giorgio Fidenato picks up what's left of his genetically altered corn after anti-GMO activists trampled it, back in 2010.

Italian farmer Giorgio Fidenato picks up what's left of his genetically altered corn after anti-GMO activists trampled it, back in 2010.

The headlines on the press releases that started showing up yesterday, here at The Salt certainly got our attention. Just one sample: "BREAKING NEWS: New Study Links Genetically Engineered Food to Tumors."

The reason for all the excitement was a study published this week in the well-respected journal Food and Chemical Toxicology. The French scientists who conducted the study basically concluded that rats fed a diet of genetically modified corn and small amounts of herbicides got sicker faster than their counterparts eating regular corn and no herbicides.

Based on the study, several anti-GMO groups are calling for a ban and the French government is calling for more investigation, but many scientists met the research with a heavy dose of skepticism.

The study describes an experiment in which scientists fed 18 different groups of rats (ten rats in each group) various concentrations of a genetically engineered kind of corn and/or small amounts of the herbicide Roundup. (Roundup is widely used in combination with genetically engineered "Roundup Ready" crops.)

Two control groups got a diet of non-modified corn and no Roundup. The experiment went on for two years, an unusually long time. Most experiments with rats that attempt to measure the toxic effects of chemicals last only 90 days.

On average, the rats that ate GM corn or drank water laced with Roundup did worse than the control group. Tumors showed up earlier (at least in some of the groups) and more rats died than in the control groups. The contrast was most stark among female rats.

So is this solid evidence that GM corn (or other crops) are bad for you? The author of the paper, Gilles-Eric Seralini, who has been campaigning against GM crops since 1997, says yes. Definitely yes.

Other scientists say, absolutely not.

Some of their complaints about the study are aimed at the study's methods. Critics point out that the type of experimental rats used in this study are particularly prone to tumors. So if you divide up 200 of them into twenty groups, as this study did, you are likely to get very high tumor rates in some of the groups. And the fact that such clusters of tumors didn't show up in the two small control groups could easily be due to random chance.

One particularly irreverent critic, Michael Grayer, a medical statistician, pointed out that the study included 18 groups of rats that were exposed to GMOs or Roundup (nine each for male and female rats), compared to only two control groups. "The potential for cherry-picking the nice positive results here from a sea of boring null ones is immense," he wrote on his blog. "Not saying they did it, of course, but it's certainly a concern."

Also, if this experiment truly showed a link between genetically engineered food and tumors, one might expect the rats that ate more of the GM corn to develop more tumors. In fact, the opposite happened. The rats eating a diet of 33 percent GMO corn stayed healthier than animals eating food with a GMO concentration of just 11 percent.

Seralini, for his part, says that this simply shows that GMOs are toxic in a different way. They merely need to rise above a certain threshold level to have harmful effects; increasing the concentration doesn't increase the harm.

Some scientists were inclined to dismiss the study simply based on Seralini's history of anti-GMO claims. "I know this guy. He has published a lot of rubbish," says Harry Kuiper, a Dutch scientist who used to be in charge of the European Commission's research program on the safety of genetically modified foods. That program sponsored many previous studies, including animal feeding studies, which came to less alarming conclusions and got much less attention than Seralini's.

In fact, Kuiper and many of his colleagues don't even think that animal feeding studies are a very good tool for studying the safety of GM foods. If there was a harmful chemical hidden in GM corn, they say, such studies wouldn't be likely to catch it, because rats can't eat enough corn for them to get a harmful dose of the toxic or cancer-causing substance.

But apart from methodological concerns and personal animosity, there's a deeper reason why scientists like Kuiper give little credence to Seralini's studies. There's a saying in science: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. For most of the scientists who have been studying the safety of GMOs, it's an extraordinary claim, at this point, to assert that the current generation of genetically modified crops are harmful to human health.

There's no apparent reason why that should be true; No one has found new toxic substances in these crops. And the giant feeding experiment that's been going on for the past fifteen years hundreds of millions of Americans consuming GMO ingredients hasn't produced evidence of harm, either.

It would take a lot more evidence that the results of this study to change their minds.


Technology - New Scientist - Science news and science jobs from ... Find news and information on the latest new technology. Read about new inventions and advances in computer software and information technology Health News & Articles Healthy Living - ABC News Get the latest health news from Dr. Richard Besser. Here you'll find stories about new medical research, the latest health care trends and health issues that affect ... Technology and Science News - ABC News - ABCNews.com - Breaking ... Get the latest science news and technology news, read tech reviews and more at ABC News. genetic engineering Facts, information, pictures Encyclopedia ... Get information, facts, and pictures about genetic engineering at Encyclopedia.com. Make research projects and school reports about genetic engineering easy with ... Knight Science Journalism Program at MIT In a story from Los Angeles, The AP reports that a 9th case of hantavirus has been linked to Yosemite National Park. It's not an epidemic yet, and no cause for alarm ... CBC Digital Archives - CBC.ca - Canadian News Sports Entertainment ... Relive Canada's history through CBC Radio and Television. This free site features thousands of radio and television clips from the archives of the Canadian ... World Environment News - Planet Ark Know your World. Choose your Impact. The World Environment News is a daily environmental update bringing you all the latest environmental stories, pictures and video ... Genetically Modified Foods: Harmful or Helpful? - CSA Recent studies about genetically-modified foods indicate that GMOs may cause harm to monarch butterfly caterpillars. Corn plants have been ... Genetically modified food controversies - Wikipedia, the free ... The genetically modified foods controversy is a dispute over the relative advantages and disadvantages of genetically modified food crops and other uses of ... Environment - Salon.com Salon coverage: Environment ... Tuesday, Sep 11, 2012 9:31 AM UTC In Portland, fluoride debate is ideological clash