Many folks protest Monsanto's business practices, like this Greenpeace protester spraying paint on a company research soybean field in Iowa.
Many folks protest Monsanto's business practices, like this Greenpeace protester spraying paint on a company research soybean field in Iowa.
Why do so many people hate Monsanto?
Is it because this multinational corporation pioneered some enormously successful genetically engineered crops, including corn, soybeans, and cotton?
Maybe, but I suspect that much of the passion is inspired by Monsanto's hard-line approach to ownership of those crops. Monsanto claims those seeds and all offspring of those seeds as its intellectual property. Farmers aren't allowed to save and replant any part of their harvest; if they do, Monsanto takes them to court and demands large damages. Critics call the company bullying and ruthless.
Ruthless or not, in almost all cases, courts have found Monsanto's tactics perfectly legal. Now, in a move that surprised many observers, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to take a look.
The court announced earlier this month that it will hear the arguments of a 74-year-old farmer in southwestern Indiana who says that Monsanto's far-reaching claims are unfair and illegal.
The details of this case are intriguing, and slightly different from the earlier "farmer v. Monsanto" cases. This farmer, Vernon Hugh Bowman, has been a loyal customer for Monsanto's "Roundup Ready" soybeans but only for the primary growing season, in the spring and early summer. After he harvested that crop, Bowman sometimes tried to squeeze in a second harvest.
That second harvest was no sure thing, so he didn't invest a lot of money in it. He planted the cheapest seeds he could find. Sometimes he bought ordinary soybeans from the local grain elevator or another farmer, sometimes he used seeds he'd saved. (Peruse the full story yourself in the farmer's account and Monsanto's response.)
But here's the problem: Monsanto's soybeans account for 94 percent of all the soybeans grown in Indiana. So almost all the soybeans that Bowman could get his hands on contained the patented "Roundup Ready" gene.
Bowman went ahead and planted them anyway, without paying Monsanto's "technology fee." He also took advantage of the gene. It allowed him to spray Roundup (or a generic version of the same weedkiller), which made controlling weeds relatively cheap and easy.
Monsanto found out and took Bowman to court. A federal judge agreed that Bowman had broken the law and ordered him to pay $84,000. An appeals court affirmed that decision.
The arguments and counter-arguments that both sides have submitted to the Supreme Court mostly focus on the reach of Monsanto's patents specifically, whether Monsanto really can demand a royalty for the planting of any soybean containing its patented genes.
But there's a practical issue, too, and it clearly troubled Richard Young, the federal judge in Indiana who first heard this case. "Monsanto's domination of the soybean seed market," he wrote, means that all the cheap "commodity" soybeans that farmers might use for seed are now encumbered by patents.
Young found Bowman's criticism of the "monopolizing effects" of Monsanto's patents "compelling," but the judge essentially threw up his hands. Finding a remedy, he wrote, would be a matter for policymakers, "but this court does not make policy; rather, it interprets and enforces the law, which, in this case, does not support Bowman."
It will be interesting to see whether the Supreme Court decides to wade into this policy question. The case won't be heard, or decided, until sometime next year.
The Voice of Agriculture - American Farm Bureau Farm Bureau: Historical Highlights, 1919 - 1994 Foreword: This history of the Farm Bureau covers the years from its organization in 1919 through the 75th anniversary ... The World According to Monsanto Watch Free Documentary Online Theres nothing they are leaving untouched: the mustard, the okra, the bringe oil, the rice, the cauliflower. Once they have established the norm: that seed can be ... Feds order farmer to destroy his own wheat crops: The shocking ... Feds order farmer to destroy his own wheat crops: The shocking revelations of Wickard vs Filburn International News World News - ABC News Get the latest international news and events from Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and more. See world news photos and videos at ABCNews Stopdown.net Stopdown.net This is a general interest site with pages on history, science, government, art, etc. About us, contact us: click here. Art to left is by Sidney H ... Farmers Guardian Article Archives HighBeam Research Articles from Farmers Guardian on HighBeam Research ... Create a link to this page. Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog: Monsanto v. Food Inc. over How to Feed the World - BusinessWeek Anyone whos seen the documentary Food Inc. knows that Monsanto comes across as a thug. Its bioengineered soybeans, designed to be unaffected by Monsanto ... Ronnie Cummins: The Unholy Alliance: Monsanto, Dupont & Obama President Obama knows that agribusiness cannot be trusted with the policy and regulatory powers of government. On the campaign trail in 2007, he promised ... USDA Fully Deregulates Roundup Ready Alfalfa Food Safety News USDA Fully Deregulates Roundup Ready Alfalfa By Helena Bottemiller January 28, 2011. In an unexpected move, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced ... Monsanto's GMO Corn Linked To Organ Failure, Study Reveals In a study released by the International Journal of Biological Sciences, analyzing the effects of genetically modified foods on mammalian health ...
No comments:
Post a Comment